We have reached a place of ugly, triumphant majoritarianism

The injection of religious symbolism into the idea of India is deliberate, and dangerous

Lawyers clash among themselves at Patiala House Courts where JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar was produced on February 17(PTI Photo)

The sons of Bharat Mata have put their love on public display and it is not a pretty sight. At the Patiala House district court, men in black shout Bharat Mata Ki Jai as they assault journalists, students, teachers and even a panel of senior lawyers sent by the Supreme Court.

Caught on camera is BJP MLA OP Sharma chasing and hitting an activist as policemen watch quietly. A day later, the mob assaults Kanhaiya Kumar, the president of Jawaharlal Nehru University Students’ Union, arrested on yet-to-be-proved charges of sedition.

On TV, the BJP’s official spokesman – the same person who uses doctored videos on primetime — asks his co-panelists to chant with him: Bharat Mata Ki Jai. They do not oblige.

Outside Parliament, home minister Rajnath Singh and HRD Minister Smriti Irani reiterate that insults to Mother India will not be tolerated. Inside the House, Irani’s fiery speech refers to mahisasur, the demon slayed by Durga and worshipped by some communities who believe he was cheated out of a victory. A demand by students for beef is obviously an anti-national act in this worldview.

The invocation to Bharat Mata is troubling for two reasons. First, the image of Bharat Mata, bedecked as a Goddess alongside a lion, is inimical to an avowedly secular country. Ministers sworn to uphold the principles of the Republic might want to remember this and restrict their right to worship to their private spaces.

But when the government omits the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ from the Preamble in a government ad on Republic Day last year, when its ministers make liberal use of Hindu iconography in Parliament, and when its ally, the Shiv Sena asks for the word ‘secular’ to be dropped altogether, then you wonder if a deeper agenda – the installation of a Hindu nation — is at play.

Second, the injection of religious symbolism reduces nationhood to a cult and places criticism in the category of blasphemy. Insults to the Mother Goddess must be righteously avenged and violence becomes legitimised. On TV, an unrepentant Sharma asks: “If someone abuses your mother then will you not hit him?”

The purpose of the believers is not so much the defence of the nation as the imposition of a monolithic code and the intimidation of ideas, people and concepts inimical to it. (I also find the invocation to Bharat Mata troubling, given the believers’ free use of abuse against women in general — bazaaru aurat, presstitute etc. Of course, this abuse cuts across political lines as some sort of pan-national sport.)

There is an inherent contradiction. You cannot claim a love for country while stomping on its Constitutional values.

You cannot swear to defend Bharat Mata while showing such flagrant disrespect for rule of law. You cannot brandish the Tricolor in one hand while wielding a stick in the other. And you cannot justify criminal violence by hiding behind a thin fig leaf of pseudo patriotism.

So far there is not a single video that shows Kanhaiya shouting anti-national slogans and police are yet to arrest those who did. Instead, those who are in clear breach of the law by their public display of violence are out on bail after a tardy arrest.

Last week, as the sons of Bharat Mata went on their rampage, every establishment essential to our democracy – the courts, media, universities, Opposition parties — came under attack. This is not to suggest that these institutions are flawless. Far from it. But the substitution of reasoned debate by an unleashing of anarchy cannot be patriotic by any stretch and as a citizen I am deeply affronted to see my country’s flag being brandished by such a menacing mob.

In less than two years, we have reached a place of ugly, triumphant majoritarianism. The early experiments with love jihad and ghar wapsi now seem like mere pit stops in a far longer journey. The din of the national/anti-national debate masks one fact: at stake is the heart and soul of India. Who will fight for it?

The views expressed by the author are personal, she tweets @namitabhandare

Five questions after the death of Shaktiman

I have five questions in the wake of the national outrage following the death of Shaktiman the police horse:

1. Would we have given a damn had politicians not been involved?

Forget for a second that last month’s protest near the Dehradun Assembly was led by BJP legislator Ganesh Joshi. What if it had been just an average guy nobody knew? Would there have been this level of national outrage?

Instead this is how the script played out. Opposition politicians have expressed their anguish and mourned the ‘sacrifice’ of the Kathiawari mare. The Congress compared the death of the horse with the ‘death of democracy’ where President’s rule in Uttarakhand has been questioned by a High Court order. And the hugely reviled Joshi has had to fall back on the pathetic defence of a ‘political conspiracy’. He has also thoughtfully offered his own leg as recompense should he be found guilty.

On social media, liberals point to the cruelty of the right-wing that insists on a ban on cow slaughter but will flog a horse to death (metaphorically at least).The right-wing says the liberals are hypocrites who support such cruel acts as beef-eating.

“A horse was murdered in India because a politician was an animal,” tweeted Vir Das, the comedian/actor. Correct. But horses are abandoned and maimed and beaten every day. Few tears, if any, are shed for them.

2. Should we be using horses in our police force?

The BJP’s minister for women and child development Maneka Gandhi, known better for her advocacy of animal rights, wants the arrest of those responsible for the death of Shaktiman, who she describes as a ‘police officer’ on duty.

The more serious question: why do we need police horses?

In the 1800s in England, where the idea apparently originated, mounted police found it easy to nab livestock thieves. Now in an age of drones and tear gas, police horses seem like an idea past its use by date, especially given their current run of bad luck from a basketball championship in Pennsylvania to a Donald Trump rally in Kansas city where they have come under increasing assaults by people on the ground.

3. What about animals used, abused and sacrificed in the name of religion?

This year’s Pooram festival in Kerala saw 74 elephants, some with gaping wounds, standing and parading for 36 hours without respite or nourishment. In Tamil Nadu, Jallikatu (the taming of bulls) is defended as an inherent part of the Pongal tradition. Bakri-Id demands the ritual sacrifice of an animal. Animals are also sacrificed in some Hindu temples and, to its credit, the Himachal Pradesh High Court banned the slaughter of goats in temples in 2014 saying such rituals ‘must change in the modern era’.

Yet, when it comes to the big question, even the Supreme Court balked last year when it refused to entertain a public interest litigation seeking a ban on the killing of animals in the name of religion saying it “cannot close its eyes to centuries-old tradition”.

The flipside is the ban on cattle slaughter in several states that is driving farmers in drought-hit Marathwada to penury, reports the website Scroll. In cities, the sight of the revered cow foraging for scraps in garbage dumps is so commonplace that it’s no longer a cliché. (see this 34-minute video, The Plastic Cow, by Karuna Society at http://bit.ly/1Sy3C7n)

4. What about animal rights in general?

In Bangalore a housewife flings puppies against a wall. In Delhi, police nab a dog serial killer who kills strays for fun – or because he’s just sick. These are aberrations, but not so extreme. In Kerala, the Thiruvanathapuram Corporation has been co-opted into killing stray dogs. All over urban India, the feeding of stray dogs by good samaritans is turning into a battlefield. Animal rights activists are now seizing upon the death of Shaktiman to demand that the 1960 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act is updated beyond the current maximum fine of Rs 50.

5. Should Shaktiman have been euthanized the day of her accident?

Dear reader, tell me, wouldn’t that have been the more humane option?

See the article in Hindustan Times

Five questions after the death of Shaktiman

Animal welfare activists at a candle light vigil at New Delhi in honour of Shaktiman , April 21, 2016(Saumya Khandelwal/HT Photo)

I have five questions in the wake of the national outrage following the death of Shaktiman the police horse:

1. Would we have given a damn had politicians not been involved?

Forget for a second that last month’s protest near the Dehradun Assembly was led by BJP legislator Ganesh Joshi. What if it had been just an average guy nobody knew? Would there have been this level of national outrage?

Instead this is how the script played out. Opposition politicians have expressed their anguish and mourned the ‘sacrifice’ of the Kathiawari mare. The Congress compared the death of the horse with the ‘death of democracy’ where President’s rule in Uttarakhand has been questioned by a High Court order. And the hugely reviled Joshi has had to fall back on the pathetic defence of a ‘political conspiracy’. He has also thoughtfully offered his own leg as recompense should he be found guilty.

Read | The angry Indian needs to be angriest about himself

On social media, liberals point to the cruelty of the right-wing that insists on a ban on cow slaughter but will flog a horse to death (metaphorically at least).The right-wing says the liberals are hypocrites who support such cruel acts as beef-eating.

“A horse was murdered in India because a politician was an animal,” tweeted Vir Das, the comedian/actor. Correct. But horses are abandoned and maimed and beaten every day. Few tears, if any, are shed for them.

2. Should we be using horses in our police force?

The BJP’s minister for women and child development Maneka Gandhi, known better for her advocacy of animal rights, wants the arrest of those responsible for the death of Shaktiman, who she describes as a ‘police officer’ on duty.

The more serious question: why do we need police horses?

In the 1800s in England, where the idea apparently originated, mounted police found it easy to nab livestock thieves. Now in an age of drones and tear gas, police horses seem like an idea past its use by date, especially given their current run of bad luck from a basketball championship in Pennsylvania to a Donald Trump rally in Kansas city where they have come under increasing assaults by people on the ground.

Read | We have reached a place of ugly, triumphant majoritarianism

3. What about animals used, abused and sacrificed in the name of religion?

This year’s Pooram festival in Kerala saw 74 elephants, some with gaping wounds, standing and parading for 36 hours without respite or nourishment. In Tamil Nadu, Jallikatu (the taming of bulls) is defended as an inherent part of the Pongal tradition. Bakri-Id demands the ritual sacrifice of an animal. Animals are also sacrificed in some Hindu temples and, to its credit, the Himachal Pradesh High Court banned the slaughter of goats in temples in 2014 saying such rituals ‘must change in the modern era’.

Yet, when it comes to the big question, even the Supreme Court balked last year when it refused to entertain a public interest litigation seeking a ban on the killing of animals in the name of religion saying it “cannot close its eyes to centuries-old tradition”.

The flipside is the ban on cattle slaughter in several states that is driving farmers in drought-hit Marathwada to penury, reports the website Scroll. In cities, the sight of the revered cow foraging for scraps in garbage dumps is so commonplace that it’s no longer a cliché. (see this 34-minute video, The Plastic Cow, by Karuna Society at http://bit.ly/1Sy3C7n)

Read | Beast of a nation: What Shaktiman’s death tells about India

4. What about animal rights in general?

In Bangalore a housewife flings puppies against a wall. In Delhi, police nab a dog serial killer who kills strays for fun – or because he’s just sick. These are aberrations, but not so extreme. In Kerala, the Thiruvanathapuram Corporation has been co-opted into killing stray dogs. All over urban India, the feeding of stray dogs by good samaritans is turning into a battlefield. Animal rights activists are now seizing upon the death of Shaktiman to demand that the 1960 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act is updated beyond the current maximum fine of Rs 50.

5. Should Shaktiman have been euthanized the day of her accident?

Dear reader, tell me, wouldn’t that have been the more humane option?

namita.bhandare@gmail.com

Twitter:@namitabhandare

The views expressed are personal